In a recent development, the Asantehene, Otumfuo Osei Tutu II, has issued a warning to Cletus Avoka, the Member of Parliament for Zebilla Constituency and Spokesperson for the Kusasi group, regarding his public statements on the Bawku conflict. This cautionary tale unfolds against the backdrop of a decades-long chieftaincy dispute in Bawku, Ghana, which has recently intensified due to controversial remarks.
On December 16, 2025, Otumfuo expressed concern that Avoka's comments could exacerbate tensions and hinder ongoing peace initiatives in the region. The Asantehene urged Avoka to exercise caution in his public statements, emphasizing the delicate nature of the situation and the collective efforts to foster reconciliation. But here's where it gets controversial—Avoka has been an outspoken critic of the government's handling of the Bawku crisis, accusing them of complicity and a lack of commitment to peace. He even went as far as criticizing the Asantehene's role as a mediator, comparing it to interfering in chieftaincy matters in other regions, which he believes is outside the traditional governance structure.
The Kusasi group, which Avoka represents, maintains that the current Bawku Naba was legitimately installed in 1984 and is recognized by all relevant state institutions. They argue that the Nayiri, as Overlord of the Mamprugu Traditional Area, has no authority to remove or install a chief in the Kusaug Traditional Area. Avoka further stated that the Akufo-Addo administration's decision to involve the Asantehene in mediation was inappropriate and placed the President in a difficult position. He believes that discontinuing the mediation process could lead to misunderstandings about the government's intentions.
This situation highlights the complex dynamics of traditional leadership and governance in Ghana, where chieftaincy disputes often intersect with political and regional tensions. The Asantehene's warning to Avoka underscores the need for responsible public discourse, especially in volatile situations. But it also raises questions about the boundaries of free speech and the role of traditional leaders in modern Ghana. Is it fair to expect public figures to temper their criticism in the interest of peace, or should they be free to voice their opinions without restraint? This delicate balance between maintaining harmony and upholding democratic values is at the heart of this intriguing story.
