A Controversial Move to Curb Red Light Running in Bend, Oregon
In a bold step towards enhancing road safety, the City of Bend has embarked on an ambitious project to install red light cameras at some of its most accident-prone intersections. This initiative, which has sparked both excitement and controversy, aims to tackle the issue of red light running and reduce the number of crashes in the area.
Construction has already begun at key intersections, including Third Street and Reed Market Road, Third Street (Business 97) and Powers Road, and 27th Street and Neff Road. The Bend Police Department has assured residents that most of the work will take place at night to minimize any disruption to traffic flow.
But here's where it gets interesting: the city has implemented a 30-day warning period before full enforcement begins. This grace period allows drivers to adjust to the new system and become aware of the consequences of running red lights. It's a strategic move to ensure a smooth transition and educate the community about the importance of road safety.
The Bend City Council has approved a three-year contract with American Traffic Solutions, Inc. (operating as Verra Mobility) to install and manage the red light camera system. The contract, valued at up to $780,000 per year, is designed to generate revenue that will offset the costs of the program, according to Police Chief Mike Krantz.
The targeted intersections have been carefully selected based on anecdotal evidence, observations by traffic safety officers, and a survey conducted by Verra Mobility. These locations have consistently shown the highest incidents of red light running, crashes, and speeding.
And this is the part most people miss: the revenue generated from these red light cameras will not go into the city's general fund. Instead, it will be used to cover the costs of the program, ensuring that the initiative is self-sustaining and doesn't burden taxpayers.
So, what do you think? Is this a necessary step towards improving road safety, or is it an invasion of privacy and an unnecessary expense? Share your thoughts in the comments below. We'd love to hear your opinions and spark a discussion on this controversial topic.
